> On 23 Oct 2018, at 04:30, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/22/2018 6:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> The mathematical reality has noting to do with languages, except that >> languages are needed if machine/people want to share the results of their >> exploration. > > So how do you prove theorems without a language?
Of course, proving a theorem requires a theory, and a language. I was saying (see the quote) that the *arithmetical reality* does not require a language. The arithmetical reality does not require a language more than dinosaurs needed the word “dinosaur” to exist. The prime character of 17 does not need a mathematician to assert it, or to think about. To prove a theorem requires a theory, which requires a language. We can only ope that our theory is in relation with truth, but the truth of 17 is prime, assuming it true, does not need a proof to be true. A proof is neither necessary, nor sufficient. The arithmetical reality is independent of the big-bang. It is more plausible than an event like the big-bang requires some part of the arithmetical reality. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
