On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 1:10 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
*> Some in AI will say if something is just informationally intelligent (or > pseudo-intelligent) but not experientially intelligent then it will not > ever be remarkably creative - in literature, music, painting, or even > science.* > Apparently being remarkably creative is not required to be supremely good at Chess or GO or solving equations because pseudo-intelligence will beat true-intelligence at those things every time. The goal posts keep moving, true intelligence is whatever computers aren't good at. Yet. > > And it will not be conscious, > My problem is if the AI is smarter than me it will outsmart me, but if the AI isn't conscious that's the computers problem not mine. And besides, I'll never know if the AI is conscious or not just as I'll never know if you are. > >*as all humans are.* > Most humans are NOT remarkably creative in literature, music, painting or science; so why do you think all humans are conscious? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
