On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:42 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 5:31:06 AM UTC, Bruce wrote: >> >> >> But we are talking about definitions of objects, not axioms of a theory. >> We know that any axiomatic theory will necessarily be incomplete -- there >> will be formulae in the theory that are neither theorems nor the negation >> of theorems. >> > > *Based on the examples I previously offered, that QM and SR are axiomatic > theories, can we conclude they're incomplete? AG* >
Such theories of physics are not axiomatic theories. The things you referred to are broad principles, not axioms. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
