On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 7:45:46 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:53 PM Philip Thrift <cloud...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > *3D networks are combinatorial-algebraic in their definition. They are >> not defined in the language of continuos manifolds of general relativity or >> fields. A network "space" (spinfoam or other discrete structure) is not the >> space of general relativity. It is a different concept of space, which is >> Rovelli's point. Hence the term "quantum space" in Jim Baggott's book. >> Quantum space is not space in the traditional sense as taught in physics.* >> > > That's all very nice but what experiment can be performed to determine if > the idea is correct or not? If there isn't one then it's philosophy not > physics. > > John K Clark > > >
There is *no experiment* that shows *any theory* of physics to be "correct". - pt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
