On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:16:51 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: > > > > On 2/19/2019 5:10 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > > *What you wrote makes no sense. It fails to explain why motion occurs in > the absence of force. AG * > > > So did Newton: "A body in motion will remain in motion." >
*Right, but Newton "explained" why a body at "rest" can start moving, via the application of "force". What does "rest" mean in GR and what causes "motion" from that pov? Incidentally, when I posed the question of why space and time must be fused in relativity. I didn't know the answer. I came to a partial explanation by posing the question. AG* > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
