On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:42 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > *> QM better illustrates the justification for quotes. Many interpretations > that make the same predictions. AG * >
Yes, many interpretations of Quantum Mechanics make the same predictions, so at least for now which interpretation (explanation) you use is a matter of taste. I hope someday we will know enough to be able to decide among them. I like Many Worlds but that's just me *> If you're at spatial rest in spacetime * > Then you're still moving through 4D spacetime *> in the presence of a gravitational source,* > If I'm at spatial rest in the presence of a gravitational source then I'm not on a geodesic path; I could be hovering 500 feet off the ground in a rocket pushing me upward, and then the rocket stops and, since a force is no longer operating, I'm back on a geodesic path until I reach the ground and then the force of the ground provides a upward force again and I'm back on a non geodesic path through spacetime, or at least the broken parts of my body are. > * > how does GR explain the subsequent spatial motion? AG * > I don't understand the question, if I'm at spatial rest how can I be at spatial motion? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
