Vitalism is still true. Nobody knows how a being develops from embryo to its fully developed form. DNA is just a book. Nobody knows how it actually functions. It might well receive top-down influence in levels from higher order consciousness that guides the development of the biological entity.
Then Lob is just talking about other things. The true self-reference is not formalisable, since neither is nor not-is. On Friday, 19 April 2019 02:27:31 UTC+3, Russell Standish wrote: > > > The same argument was made in favour of vitalism - before the > structure and mechanics of DNA was discovered. > > Self-reference is formalisable. See Löb's theorem. > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Senior Research Fellow [email protected] > <javascript:> > Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
