Vitalism is still true. Nobody knows how a being develops from embryo to its fully developed form. DNA is just a book. Nobody knows how it actually functions. It might well receive top-down influence in levels from higher order consciousness that guides the development of the biological entity.
Then Lob is just talking about other things. The true self-reference is not formalisable, since neither is nor not-is. On Friday, 19 April 2019 02:27:31 UTC+3, Russell Standish wrote: > > > The same argument was made in favour of vitalism - before the > structure and mechanics of DNA was discovered. > > Self-reference is formalisable. See Löb's theorem. > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Senior Research Fellow hpc...@hpcoders.com.au > <javascript:> > Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
