My feedback for you, if you care for it, is to find a way to disprove your ideas in principle. What fact, if uncovered, what clearly show your ideas to be false? What counter-intuitive prediction could be used to test them?
Without that, all you appear to have is a set of ideas, a little too close to solipsism, in which explanations for anything can be generated in terms of mysterious forms of consciousness. Terren On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:22 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote: > You can still continue to make science as you are doing it today, in order > to increase the quality of life. The thing is that you never had causality, > determinism, prediction, and any hope of understanding the universe to > start with. What we gain is precisely this: the ability to understand > existence. You can still make predicitons, but they will be prediciton of > the kind: "If you put your hand into the fire, you will get burned. Don't > you believe me ? Try it!", namely predictions by way of experience. First > someone experiences something (without prediction what it will be, because > you cannot predict something that you never experienced), and then by > understanding the context that generated that specific meaning, you will > invite other consciousness to put themselves into that precise context. God > himself created the world in order to experience things. He couldn't have > imagined by his own will new qualia, because he didn't have the proper > contexts for those qualia to be brought into existence. So he forgot about > himself and reincarnated in all the consciousness in the world, and those > consciousness through their interactions establish contexts and contexts > give birth to meaning/qualia. This way, God gets to know himself. Is the > only way. > > On Monday, 22 April 2019 15:48:32 UTC+3, Terren Suydam wrote: >> >> So to summarize: >> >> - We lose: causality, determinism, prediction, and any hope of >> understanding the universe without getting into the minds of competing >> consciousnesses, some proportion of which don't inhabit biological bodies >> - We gain: >> >> Can you help me out with that second line? Why should anyone take your >> theory seriously when it means jettisoning science? What's the payoff? >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
