The Quran presents a similar idea of one gigantic sky layered into seven skies, each with its own laws/commands/affair. Please read excerpt below
... Revisiting Surah alFussilat (Explained in Detail), we read: ثُمَّ اسْتَوَىٰ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ وَهِيَ دُخَانٌ فَقَالَ لَهَا وَلِلْأَرْضِ ائْتِيَا طَوْعًا أَوْ كَرْهًا قَالَتَا أَتَيْنَا طَائِعِينَ فَقَضَاهُنَّ سَبْعَ سَمَاوَاتٍ فِي يَوْمَيْنِ وَأَوْحَىٰ فِي كُلِّ سَمَاءٍ أَمْرَهَاوَزَيَّنَّا السَّمَاءَ الدُّنْيَا بِمَصَابِيحَ وَحِفْظًا ذَٰلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ Then He directed (Himself) towards the heaven while it (was) smoke, and He said to it and to the earth, "Come both of you willingly or unwillingly." They both said, "We come willingly." Then He completed them (as) seven heavens in two periods and He revealed in each heaven its affair. And We adorned the heaven, [the world] with lamps and (to) guard. That (is the) Decree (of) the All-Mighty, the All-Knower. [Al-Quran 41:11-12] ... excerpt from: http://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2018/11/separate-in-space.html > On 15-May-2019, at 8:41 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some years ago, some astronomer or cosmologist introduced the idea of One > Gigantic Universe, but many, many, "domains," which, for me, is the same > thing as Everett's-Deutsch's-Tegmark's multiverses. I am not sure if all > domains followed the identical laws, or varied, or..? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> > To: everything-list <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, May 15, 2019 11:31 am > Subject: Re: My book "I Am" published on amazon > > >> On 13 May 2019, at 08:55, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 9:40:12 PM UTC-5, Jason wrote: >> >> >> >> Incompleteness disproves nominalism. Arithmetical truth was proven not only >> to be not human defined, but to be not human definable. >> >> >> >> (This is something I posted a few days ago in another forum.) >> >> From Joel David Hamkins @JDHamkins - http://jdh.hamkins.org/ >> >> "Truths" in the set-theoretic multiverse (slides from a talk last week): >> >> http://jdh.hamkins.org/wp- content/uploads/Is-there-more- >> than-one-mathematical- universe.pdf >> >> >> The final slides: >> >> ---- >> >> The Continuum Hypothesis is settled >> >> On the multiverse perspective, the CH question is settled. >> It is incorrect to describe it as an open question. >> >> The answer consists of our detailed understanding of how the >> CH both holds and fails throughout the multiverse, of how these >> models are connected and how one may reach them from each >> other while preserving or omitting certain features. >> >> Fascinating open questions about CH remain, of course, but the >> most important essential facts are known. >> >> Ultimately, the question becomes: do we have just one >> mathematical world or many >> >> ---- >> >> Mathematics is a language - with multiple dialects. >> >> Each dialect of mathematics has its own syntax (to some extent) and >> semantics! > > If it has a semantic, it is not just a language, there is a > reality/model/semantic, and we have to distinguish languages and possible > theories on that reality. > > It is obvious (for a mathematical logician) that there are many mathematical > worlds, but like in physics, this does not interfere with realism, on the > contrary. Now, I use only arithmetical realism, on which everybody agree. The > standard arithmetical truth is definable with a bit of set theory, on which > most people agree (as it is the intersection of all models of the theories RA > or PA). That is as acceptable as any theorem in analysis. With Mechanism, > Analysis, and physics, remains full of sense, but have became > phenomenological. > > >> >> >> >> There is no settled "truth" in mathematics. >> >> For example (as Hamkins shows) the CH is true in one dialect (of set theory) >> and false in another. > > That was shown by Cohen and Gödel. > > Interestingly, ZFC and ZF + CH does not prove more arithmetical propositions > than ZF alone. The arithmetical truth is totally independent of the axiom of > choice or the continuum hypotheses. > > Now, ZF proves much more theorems in arithmetic than PA, which proves much > more than RA. > > Bruno > > > >> >> @philipthrift >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/06ca3480-cdf1-426b-9f38-404bc2fa1550%40googlegroups.com. >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/07CE2D6F-E36D-45E6-883E-E9A13C4812B3%40ulb.ac.be > . > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1625287452.1090267.1557934879733%40mail.yahoo.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/F3788EBD-E91D-4264-8873-6A4BD0A8D204%40gmail.com.
