On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:24:47PM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Friday, August 23, 2019 at 5:54:17 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > The reason to suspect that arithmetic comes from matter (M→A) vs. > matter > > comes from arithmetic (A→M) is that with A→M there many Ms. > > > > > > On the contrary: Arithmetic (A) explains why there is many geographies > and > > history, but only one physics, the same fr all universal machine. That > is > due > > to the fact that Physics (Matter, M) emerges from the first person > > indeterminacy on *all* computations. > > So A explains why there is only one M possible, and why the physical > reality is > > the same for all universal machine/number. > > With A, the physical laws are justified being laws, and we get some > criteria > > (lacking in physics+physicalism) to distinguish physics and geography. > > This answer is a bit glib IMHO. In some ways it echos the statements I > give in section 9.3 of my book "Theory of Nothing", but which I freely > admitted I felt were provisional and too hand-wavy. However, I believe > that Markus Mueller has since provided an answer in the form of a > theorem (Thm 2.3 "Emergence of an Objective Reality") in his paper > arXiv: 1712.01816. > > That paper to me is probably the most significant result in this area > since I published my book. > > Cheers > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Senior Research Fellow [email protected] > Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au > > > > So how does one get from (simple) > > https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01816v1.pdf > > to (complex) > > > https://www.sciencealert.com/images/Screen_Shot_2016-08-03_at_3.20.12_pm.png > (the Lagrangian Standard Model equation) > > ? > > @philipthrift >
A partial answer is explored in Stenger's "Comprehensible Cosmos". In brief, its a combination of symmetries and symmetry breaking. But, as they say, the devil is in the details. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Senior Research Fellow [email protected] Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/20190825042635.GG2402%40zen.
