> On 21 Aug 2019, at 21:17, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8/21/2019 1:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> So A explains why there is only one M possible > > So what is the one possible M? Physicist build 10 billion dollar machines to > try to find out. If you can do it from your desk, let's hear about it?
A part of this has been already done, and I have explained it here. Once you assume Mechanism, it is conceptually very simple, the physical reality emerges from the conditional statistics on all computations, and it works already by justifying the quantum shape of the physical reality. Only the future will show if what they found with the 10 billion dollars machine could have been deduced from arithmetic; or if it belongs to some geographical type of reality. In most case, you can bet that observation will be quicker than deduction in arithmetic, but that has nothing to do with the conceptual question. Arithmetic already explains why observation provides information more quicker than the very hard derivation that Mechanism makes obligatory, if we want to keep both the quanta and the qualia. The key, is that when we assume digital mechanism, there is just no choice in the matter (sorry for the pun). Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cc4c2bc8-a6d1-0fcc-d248-16a21410bfe0%40verizon.net. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/81ACA22F-7AC2-48C0-934A-EE88285E0B2D%40ulb.ac.be.
