On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:42:58 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > Why not make your point with waves so at least it's intelligible? You can > get the same results in the Heisenberg Picture, but to understand > "interference" you need to at least start with waves. AG >
But that premise (*to understand "interference" you need to at least start with waves*) is simply wrong, and perhaps is the root of your misunderstanding. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8051c273-6137-435e-b8ea-0d3c0b12b9a4%40googlegroups.com.
