On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 4:19:06 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:15:21 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 4:09:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:03:20 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:42:58 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why not make your point with waves so at least it's intelligible? You >>>>> can get the same results in the Heisenberg Picture, but to understand >>>>> "interference" you need to at least start with waves. AG >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But that premise (*to understand "interference" you need to at least >>>> start with waves*) is simply wrong, and perhaps is the root of your >>>> misunderstanding. >>>> >>>> @philipthrift >>>> >>> >>> No, it's just a convenient, intuitive starting pont. That's all. I >>> conclude you can't do it. Thanks for the effort. AG >>> >> >> >> I conclude you will never understand any answer to your question: "what >> does *interference* mean". >> >> @philipthrift >> > > You could start with S's equation and use waves in your explanation, and > then generalize it. But the fact that you refuse to do so, and instead rely > on other interpretations, such as Heisenberg's, suggests you don't > understand "interference". AG >
*You could start with S's equation and use waves in your explanation, and then generalize it.* OK. When you find an explanation in these terms, let us know. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7628e75c-41fa-4a72-8958-0545cac8a516%40googlegroups.com.
