On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:15:21 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 4:09:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:03:20 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:42:58 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Why not make your point with waves so at least it's intelligible? You >>>> can get the same results in the Heisenberg Picture, but to understand >>>> "interference" you need to at least start with waves. AG >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> But that premise (*to understand "interference" you need to at least >>> start with waves*) is simply wrong, and perhaps is the root of your >>> misunderstanding. >>> >>> @philipthrift >>> >> >> No, it's just a convenient, intuitive starting pont. That's all. I >> conclude you can't do it. Thanks for the effort. AG >> > > > I conclude you will never understand any answer to your question: "what > does *interference* mean". > > @philipthrift >
You could start with S's equation and use waves in your explanation, and then generalize it. But the fact that you refuse to do so, and instead rely on other interpretations, such as Heisenberg's, suggests you don't understand "interference". AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4bb5d61a-041e-46ef-bbb3-390d96958fce%40googlegroups.com.
