On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:03:20 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:42:58 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> Why not make your point with waves so at least it's intelligible? You can >> get the same results in the Heisenberg Picture, but to understand >> "interference" you need to at least start with waves. AG >> > > > > But that premise (*to understand "interference" you need to at least > start with waves*) is simply wrong, and perhaps is the root of your > misunderstanding. > > @philipthrift >
No, it's just a convenient, intuitive starting pont. That's all. I conclude you can't do it. Thanks for the effort. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6d88f805-6dd5-4f95-9761-fdc913ed2383%40googlegroups.com.
