On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 4:09:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:03:20 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:42:58 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Why not make your point with waves so at least it's intelligible? You >>> can get the same results in the Heisenberg Picture, but to understand >>> "interference" you need to at least start with waves. AG >>> >> >> >> >> But that premise (*to understand "interference" you need to at least >> start with waves*) is simply wrong, and perhaps is the root of your >> misunderstanding. >> >> @philipthrift >> > > No, it's just a convenient, intuitive starting pont. That's all. I > conclude you can't do it. Thanks for the effort. AG >
I conclude you will never understand any answer to your question: "what does *interference* mean". @philipthrift @philipthtift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8391294d-2bb8-4ba2-8b74-ea3bb6fa4373%40googlegroups.com.
