On 1/20/2020 5:00 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
What justifies your rejecting one kind of infinity (expansion)
while accepting other infinities (extent)?
Expansion by itself can never result in any infinity because the rate
is always finite, and the duration is finite, 13.8 BY. Can you not
understand this?
I understand you are asserting the rate is always finite. But assertion
is cheap. You allow for other infinities. Why not infinite rates.
What other infinities? I do assume the Multiverse is infinite in all
parameters, but acknowledge that we have no knowledge of what it is.
Maybe our categories of space and time don't apply to it. AG
Maybe your categories of infinite rates don't apply. What is it you're
trying to argue? That all those stupid physicists who think the
universe may be flat and infinite in extent are fools? Well then all
you have to do show that "infinite" is obviously wrong. All this talk
about expansion and rates and beginnings is irrelevant.
Brent
You just ramble about your intuition as though it were
mathematical logic.
Not mathematical logic, just logic. AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5E2657FD.2070300%40verizon.net.
