Right Jesse, I don't worship at the Church of Dark Matter, merely like to give 
speculative science a voice. If such doesn't exist, well, I will get over it 
somehow. Theoretical physics for me, is only useful (to me) if it can somehow 
be applied to help people? If somebody quotes a physicist, then he quotes a 
physicist. I am suspecting that there are discoveries yet to be made regarding 
the universe, all waiting for the correct equipment to detect and observe. But 
that claim of mine may not be true. Onwards we roll, with me habitually keeping 
an eye to my own questions; can it be helpful, can it be used?


-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Mazer <laserma...@gmail.com>
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 28, 2021 1:17 am
Subject: Re: Dark-Matter Universe?

Lisa Randall's work doesn't say anything about dark matter interacting with 
baryonic (normal) matter via the strong nuclear force or the electromagnetic 
force (the former is responsible for binding the nucleus of atoms together, the 
latter for electromagnetic radiation and chemical bonds), so the kind of dark 
matter that she postulates could have nothing to do with biophotons or the 
supposed "additional mass of life" that Philip Benjamin mentions. Rather her 
suggestion about a new "hypothetical type of dark matter" is about a type of 
dark matter particle that interacts more strongly with other dark matter 
particles of the same type, different from the standard idea of "cold dark 
matter" that has almost no non-gravitational self-interaction. See the abstract 
of her paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1521 which talks about how this 
hypothetical form of dark matter could self-interact in a way that causes it 
"cool efficiently and form a disk within galaxies":
"Based on observational constraints on large scale structure and halo 
structure, dark matter is generally taken to be cold and essentially 
collisionless. On the other hand, given the large number of particles and 
forces in the visible world, a more complex dark sector could be a reasonable 
or even likely possibility. This hypothesis leads to testable consequences, 
perhaps portending the discovery of a rich hidden world neighboring our own. We 
consider a scenario that readily satisfies current bounds that we call 
Partially Interacting Dark Matter (PIDM). This scenario contains 
self-interacting dark matter, but it is not the dominant component. Even if 
PIDM contains only a fraction of the net dark matter density, comparable to the 
baryonic fraction, the subdominant component's interactions can lead to 
interesting and potentially observable consequences. Our primary focus will be 
the special case of Double-Disk Dark Matter (DDDM), in which self-interactions 
allow the dark matter to lose enough energy to lead to dynamics similar to 
those in the baryonic sector. We explore a simple model in which DDDM can cool 
efficiently and form a disk within galaxies, and we evaluate some of the 
possible observational signatures."
Randall later offered the speculation that if such a disc exists, its 
gravitational influence on our solar system passing through it periodically 
over huge spans of time might disrupt the orbits of small bodies like asteroids 
and comets enough to make mass extinctions more likely during such transits, 
which could fit with prior speculations that mass extinctions seem roughly 
periodic (I remember this was once used to argue for the existence that the Sun 
could have a companion star, 'Nemesis', with an extremely long eccentric orbit, 
though from what I remember the whole idea that mass extinctions are periodic 
was dismissed by many as finding a false pattern in noisy data). This is 
discussed in the review of her book "Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs" at 
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/29/books/review/dark-matter-and-the-dinosaurs-by-lisa-randall.html
 which says that the hypothetical self-interaction force between dark matter 
has been called "dark light" (though the name is just an analogy, it would be 
separate from the electromagnetic force), and it also says that she emphasizes 
that all this is extremely speculative.
Jesse
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:53 PM spudboy100 via Everything List 
<everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Sorry LC, you as a physicist probably don't have time or interest  to answer 
PB's assertions, but refutation rationally requires a person to show how Lisa 
Randall is wrong? The same with Sorli  in Slovenia. On the other hand if you 
don't like beer, nobody is going to make you like beer. Are you obligated to 
enter into endless discussions concerning assertions on physics that you know 
to be wrong? Naw. Most days, I just don't have the interest in purported, 
dark-matter life, anymore than I have the interest in angels. From our limited 
perspective today in 2021, the likelihood of other civilizations appears remote 
to the point of having become uninteresting. Refuting may best be done by 
lawyers, but dismissing your colleagues' works seems much more sketchy.  


-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Crowell <goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com>
To: Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 24, 2021 4:01 pm
Subject: Re: Dark-Matter Universe?

This is absolute codswallop.
LC

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 2:27:31 PM UTC-5 medinuclear wrote:

[Philip Benjamin]     Putative champions of dark-mater theoriesuse the term 
“dark-matter universe” without fully appreciating its implications 
http://cosmos.nautil.us/feature/134/does-dark-matter-harbor-life), 
Thisnecessarily requires more than application of physics to dark-matter per 
se. Universe involves life forms. Dark-matter universe is no exception. That 
also entails resonant dark-matter lives from the moment of conception -- bio 
dark-matter body vis-à-vis bio light-matter body. No chemistry, no life!       
What these theorists are focusing is the unknown astrophysical dark-matter. It 
needs be noted that the known astrophysical light-matter is largely ions of the 
most abundant elements of the universe-- H and He, while the biospherical 
light-matter consists of the 92+ elements of the Periodic Table. From 
symmetrical considerations, there may be a class of biospherical dark-matter 
which these these theorists hypothesize as “small fraction of dark matter” with 
the further remark that “it is definitely a worthwhile theory to explore,  
which has to be bio dark-matter chemistry of bio dark-matter atoms. Chemistry 
meanschemical bondswhich are spin-governed particle configurations of duets and 
octets. It is conceivable that the three flavors of neutrinos may be the 
counterparts of electrons, protons and neutrons. The masses of ν 1 and ν 2 are 
known to be close to one another (verisimilar to the close masses of p and n, 
while ν 3 weighs much less than the other two, such that the ratios of the 
masses of the neutrino flavors correspond to the ratios of the masses of e, p, 
n. Or. the dark matter atoms may consist of monopoles (N & S) and axions, all 
of negligible mass relative to electron mass, but with the same ratios as e, p, 
n. Empirical Evidences:       1 . Unidentified “Additional Mass of Life” for a 
living organism in a hermitically sealed system, which disappears at death as 
reported by Amrit S. Sorli, Scientific Research Centre BISTRA, Ptuj, 
Slovenia,http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary; doi=10.1.1.218.573; 
https://core.ac.uk/display/21767122. 2012, Journal of Theoretics Vol.4-2).      
       2 . Unidentified Source of biophotons.      Dark and light chemical 
bonds have similar properties, interact with each other, rotate, vibrate, 
oscillate, have reciprocal motion, stretch, contract, have resonance 
structures, associate, dissociate, bend and break. These cause weak changes in 
energetics of thelight-matter chemical bonds, and result in emission of weak 
photons. They indeed exist and are  known asbiophotons. Attributing the origin 
of that emission to DNA is flawed, since the standardizedrate of emission 
varies across the taxa by an order of magnitude though the DNA structures are 
the same.  The sudden burst of biophotons at the moment of death of plant and 
animal cells results from the breaking of the coupling forces. OBE/NDE 
phenomena depend on the extent of  “bond-dissociation”.  
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282154962_Bio_dark-Matter_Chemistry_Implicationshttps://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_spirit_our_energy_Is_spirit_dark_energyhttp://biodarkmatter.webs.com/index.htm
                                                                                
                    
https://www.prlog.org/12085722-dr-philip-benjamin-explains-the-bio-chemistry-of-our-inner-selves-in-his-latest-book.html
  “Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit” Corollary:    At the moment of conception 
both light and dark twins in resonance are cocreated. The former is electric, 
entropic and unenduring. The latter is non-electric, non-entropic and enduring. 
Resonance is rudimentary recognition. That may  be the basis of self-awareness. 
         That means the application of universal laws of chemistry (chemical 
bonds= spin governed particle configurations of duets and octets). The resonant 
twins of bio light-matter and bio dark-matter bodies are cocreated at the 
moment of conception. For the sake of symmetry, the former is electric, 
entropic and non-enduring; the latter is non-electric, non-entropic and 
enduring. Resonance is rudimentary recognition. It may be the basis of 
self-awareness of conscious beings. Consciousness itself must be an integral 
part of an enduring but dormant bio dark-matter body. The dormancy need be 
quickened or awakened by an external agency, as in the case of Augustine the 
chief architect of modern Western Civilization.  Philip Benjamin                
      CC. Harvard Center of Fundamental Laws of Nature & High Energy Theory.  
Notes:           https://nautil.us/issue/48/chaos/does-dark-matter-harbor-life 
Does Dark Matter Harbor Life? An invisible civilization could be living right 
under your nose. BY LISA RANDALL                     
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/06/delving-into-dark-matter/   
“Though dark matter is otherwise believed to be non-interacting, theoretical 
physicists Lisa Randall, the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science, and 
Matthew Reece, assistant professor of physics, earlier this year [2014] 
suggested that a hypothetical type of dark matter could form a disk of material 
that runs through the center of the galaxy”…. “If you were to look at our world 
and assume there was only one type of particle, you’d be pretty wrong,” Randall 
said. “I think it’s definitely a worthwhile theory to explore, because even if 
this is only a small fraction of dark matter,there is six times more dark 
matter in the universe than ordinary matter.We care a lot about ordinary 
matter, and that’s precisely because it has interactions.So if there is a small 
portion of dark matter that has those interactions, that may be what we should 
pay attention to, perhaps even more so than other dark matter.”.Philip Benjamin.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e46aeb0c-4844-447d-a24b-a2ed6e133bb8n%40googlegroups.com.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/941875287.620243.1635191600567%40mail.yahoo.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAPCWU3LXLhcsSm_pmf_JhkbyQ4uiM7br9GSpJdurV6Ccrugznw%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1071360650.1372879.1635469351069%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to