On 7/7/2024 8:58 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 3:03 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

    /> // I think such foresight is a necessary component of
    intelligence, not a "byproduct"./


I agree, I can detect the existence of foresight in others and so can natural selection, and that's why we have it.  It aids in getting our genes transferred into the next generation. But I was talking about consciousness not foresight, and regardless of how important we personally think consciousness is, from evolution's point of view it's utterly useless, and yet we have it, or at least I have it. Why? It must be because consciousness is the byproduct of something else
You miss my point.  I thought it was obvious that foresight requires consciousness.  It requires the ability of think in terms of future scenarios in which you are an actor, i.e. to be conscious of yourself with an imaginary play.

Brent

that is not useless, there are no other possibilities.  Incidentally, GPT has demonstrated foresight, when shown a picture of somebody holding a pair of scissors next to a string holding down a helium balloon and  asked "what comes next?" it replies that the string is about to be cut by the scissors and then the balloon will float away.

John K Clark    See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
hbf




    Anybody who claims that philosophical zombies are possible needs
    to ask themselves one question.Natural selection cannot select
    for something it cannot see, and it can't directly see
    consciousness any better than we can, except in ourselves; so how
    did Evolution manage to produce at least one conscious being, and
    probably many billions of them? I think the answer is that
    although Evolutioncan't see consciousness it can certainly see
    intelligent activity, so consciousness must be an inevitable
    byproduct of intelligence.
    I

    Or to put it another way, it's a brute fact that consciousness is
    the way data feels when it is being processed. After all, without
    exception, every iterated sequence of "why" or "how" questions
    either goes on forever or terminates in a brute fact.

    John K Clark    See what's on my new list at Extropolis
    <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
    wfn
    --

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3XGz7MJdzy7P2cnmq96McL1U_6r8k5bKpQKMCbkS5bBA%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3XGz7MJdzy7P2cnmq96McL1U_6r8k5bKpQKMCbkS5bBA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7886b9db-6f60-438f-93f9-a0b62236ec41%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to