And then I can call you and pay you to fix the mess. :-)

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> 
> 
> It is possible that your best option is to do as I suggest 
> and give them the options well in advance of a crisis and 
> then let the crisis happen. You can even warn them along the 
> way if you want.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> 
> 
> I am finally getting management to make some decisions.  But 
> they have a habit of putting things off until we are in a 
> crisis situation.  I hate to have to wait until all hell 
> breaks loose and then both management AND the users are 
> throwing a fit.
> 
> Jim 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:06 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> > 
> > 
> > Like the other Ed is telling you, it shouldn't be your job to make 
> > their business decisions.  You explain the ramifications of 
> having no 
> > quotas currently, what it will mean in the future, and the costs to 
> > change things.  That is, you present options to management.
> > 
> > You should be positioning your job as a service provider, a 
> helper.  
> > Do your best to leave the policeman role to those best equipped to 
> > handle it, i.e., management.  Your customers, the users, 
> will love you 
> > more in the morning that way.
> > 
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > Tech Consultant
> > hp Services
> > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> James Liddil
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:27 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> > 
> > 
> > > And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is
> > to support.
> > > Has management told you to put limits? When the email or
> > file system
> > > was presented to them, did you say that there were going to
> > be limits.
> > 
> > No.  But I had no idea things would get the way they have.  
> I do have 
> > mailbox management set to delete mail from the "deleted 
> items" every 
> > seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who 
> had over 
> > 10 megs of stuff in there.  So users need more training.  
> Easier said 
> > than done.  So I had a discussion with the CFO about this.  His 
> > analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail 
> > build up on your table until it breaks.  Do people do this?  And if
> > they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the 
> > money on raises but on more computer hardware/software.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you
> > > think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact 
> > IT and then
> > > to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business
> > > problems. You have presented no cases that justify any 
> > limits. You've
> > > actually presented some pretty good cases for not having
> > limits. Your
> > > company is small, probably to get away from the large
> > staffs and stay
> > > innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling
> > > innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their 
> > > job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a 
> > > better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to 
> > > store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping 
> > > a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are 
> > > better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways 
> > > available and very easy for them to use.
> > 
> > In a perfect world.  I only wish I had the time, resources
> > and energy to do what you say.  You are right that we want to 
> > stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much 
> > stagnation as in a big company.  I am a scientist
> > (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug 
> > development research.  Now I am a computer geek and I 
> > understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing 
> > research.  I have been on both sides and still am.  But 
> > computers like any scientific instrument require a certain 
> > amount of maintenance etc.  Too often users feel computers 
> > are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning.  As 
> > much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more 
> > training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other 
> > things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business.  
> > So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life.  
> > Sure I can tell management that "I told you so" when things 
> > break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. 
> >  So maybe I am just whining, and should just get over it.  So 
> > the bottom line is it is OK to use exchange as a database and 
> > not worry about it.
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:43 PM
> > > Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
> > > Conversation: Unlimited Quotas
> > > Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I agree as long as there is money to support it.  But keep in mind
> > > that having a large IS means that there is that much more 
> stuff for 
> > > lawyers or the FDA (we do drug development) to go after.  
> > And if you
> > > are going to have an unlimited store it ahs to be managed.  Those
> > > tools are not free.  I man IT shop and unless I get an open ended 
> > > budget I have to make some decisions.  My request for 
> > journal/archive
> > > software is going unanswered.  So all I can do is tell
> > management that
> > > both myself and our legal counsel made suggestions. Then 
> I just do 
> > > my job.  And I imagine some of this is due to the fact I 
> come from 
> > > having used a VAX account that had pretty strict limits 
> (I still use
> 
> > > it. Either you managed it or it would lock you out.  I know times 
> > > have changed.
> > > 
> > > Jim
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:32 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Why do you pretend to be arrogant enough to be able to
> > dictate the
> > > > needs of others? You don't seem to have any business drivers to
> > > > justify your actions. And who is to say that getting
> > > additional disk
> > > > drives for the user email storage isn't out of the question?
> > > > 
> > > > And as to storage, it has nothing to do with processor and RAM.
> > > > 
> > > > And most importantly, just because you don't restrict the users
> > > > storage, doesn't mean that you will run out of space. That's 
> > > > absolutely hogwash, a justification of why many IT shops 
> > get such a
> > > > bad reputation. Your job is to SUPPORT your users, not be a
> > > dictator.
> > > > In the whole scheme of things, a few thousand dollars for
> > some disk
> > > > space and maybe an upgrade in Exchange editions is petty cash.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The BUSINESS driver should not be an IT limit. Exchange 
> really is 
> > > > able to support most business drivers with little
> > difficulty. In the
> > 
> > > > limitation of storage, that should be completely 
> dictated by you 
> > > > organizations Document Retention Policy, which should be
> > dictated by
> > 
> > > > the lawyers. And it shouldn't even be an IT function to 
> enforce, 
> > > > even if you can.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 
> > > > Friday, July 05, 2002 9:18 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
> > > > Conversation: Unlimited Quotas
> > > > Subject: Unlimited Quotas
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I am being asked to justify why I have set quotas for 
> users on our
> 
> > > > E2K server with 25 users.  Things that come to mind are
> > that if we
> > > > give users unlimited stores, we will have to buy more
> > disk space in
> > > > time. Also we have a single processor server with 512 ram.  So I
> > > > would make a WAG and say that we will be looking at a second 
> > > > processor and more RAM. I am already looking at more RAM 
> > since our
> > > > server is paging quite a bit. And as we implement archiving and
> > > > journaling this will impact disk space as well as the 
> > backup (time,
> > > > number of tapes).  I also realize that allowing unlimited space
> > > > leads to users never managing their e-mail.
> > > > 
> > > > So besides these reasons are there any other reasons 
> that I should
> 
> > > > be thinking about?  Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > Jim Liddil
> > > > 
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to