Don't question the Ed.

The original message is still stored using SIS.  Each reply is also stored
using SIS.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> 
> 
> On your comment about
> 
> Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually taking up on 
> your server? 1GB?
> Not with single instance storage!
> -------------------------------------------
> I think you might not quite understand the problem with SIS, 
> it is only good
> for when the email is being sent in transit because as soon 
> as it arrives
> and the person replies to it with Outlook, bingo no more SIS for that
> message. My last place of work and current we get roughly 1.3 ratio.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Paul
> 
> Standards are like toothbrushes,
> everybody agrees you should have one,
> but no one wants to use yours
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> 
> 
> 
> Yes I've worked in small companies. And I've sold to small 
> companies. I dare
> say that I understand the dynamics fairly well.  Disk space, 
> tape space, and
> backup time are all simple issues, present them to the purse 
> strings and let
> them make the decision.
> 
> 1GB of saved email? You aren't even in the big leagues here. 
> I'd say that
> well over 50% of the users on this list have one ore more 
> mailboxes with 1GB
> storage.  Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually 
> taking up on your
> server? 1GB? Not with single instance storage! And as I said, 
> the 90%-10%
> rule goes to work.
> 
> No, my regards of a TB as small doesn't mean that I don't 
> know the small
> business environment, it only means that I work with a large range of
> customers. But I also know that 1TB isn't that expensive 
> anymore. That's
> only seven 160GB drives. I've known many small companies with 
> seven drive
> servers. When 4GB drives were common, it wasn't that odd to 
> have that many
> drives. 
> 
> Yes, I know that you often have to beg and plead with a 
> customer to get a
> tape backup. So? That's what I'm saying. The customer (aka "business
> drivers") get to make the decisions. Don't assume that they 
> always want
> everything. Don't assume that they want nothing. I've seen too many
> situations where IT people say that management doesn't want 
> to do something
> and then someone puts together a quick business case and it 
> goes through
> unhampered. 
> 
> 
> 
> But the most important thing here is to make believable and 
> knowledgeable
> recommendations to the business drivers. Make sure that your 
> recommendations
> are prudent. Understand what levels of spending the business 
> drivers are
> making. Know what to recommend and when to recommend it. It's 
> a big deal
> making sure that you are forecasting your needs correctly and 
> getting them
> into the budget cycle. Make longer term, comprehensive plans. 
> Do you have
> your email storage charted out for the next 5 years? Do you 
> have growth
> projections and timelines that new servers or disks will have to come
> online?
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:11 AM
> Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
> Conversation: Unlimited Quotas
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> 
> 
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, at 10:47pm, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
> > And as to disk drives, I can speak pretty knowledgeably in this
> > situation, there is virtually no storage limitations within 
> Exchange 
> > that impacts the per user storage.
> 
>   Yah, and what about when you run out of physical disk space, or tape
> space, or backup time?  "Buy more/better equipment", you say, 
> but have you
> ever worked in small company environment, where investing 
> money in IT can
> sometimes require something close to an act of Congress?
> 
> > And as to users keeping things forever, that's pretty much hogwash.
> 
>   You don't have our customers, then.  We've got several 
> people in several
> different organizations that have over one *gigabyte* of 
> saved mail data.  
> And we are by no means a large company.
> 
> > That means that even something as small as a TB requires well over
> > 1,000 users.
> 
>   The fact that your regard one terabyte as "small" indicates 
> that you don't
> really understand the small business situation, where we 
> often have to beg
> and plead with the customer to buy a 20 GB tape backup drive.
> 
>   Quote policy is something that should be done on a 
> case-by-case basis.
> 
> Blanket statements about what is applicable are bogus.  
> However, not having
> any policy at all is almost sure to cause headaches down the road.
> 
> -- 
> Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the 
> author and do
> | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any 
> other person, 
> | entity or  | organization.  All information is provided without 
> | warranty of any kind.  |
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> **************************************************************
> *********************************
> The information contained in this message or any of its 
> attachments may be confidential and is intended for the 
> exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, 
> reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of 
> this communication is strictly prohibited without the express 
> permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email 
> are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony 
> or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 
> 
> This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United 
> Kingdom Limited.
> (6)
> **************************************************************
> *********************************
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to