--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" <raviyogi@...> wrote:
> For people fascinated with the world these revolutionaries are great
> heroes. The crowd is a myth, there are only individuals and true
> transformation is only possible with the individuals. Taking a look
> superficially the self-realized masters also seem to be dealing with a
> crowd as well but it is just a misconception they really work at an
> individual level. The only revolution that is possible is inner but
its
> a pity that its never satisfying for the ego since it is the ego death
> itself. Real peace, happiness, love, compassion is only possible with
an
> inner revolution. Hope I made some sense.
>
Thanks,  I think I got it on the second read.  And it is an interesting
perspective.  I am not sure how I feel about it.  Yea, of course the
real "revolution" must occur within.  But between that, and a figure
(personality) to inspire the "masses" there is the possibility of
someone who can inspire others to take actions that can produce changes
in their evironment, county, or world. If that makes any sense.

Reply via email to