I have no problem believing there is a vast intelligence behind all creation - I just don't believe in one that gives special love and attention to people who do vedic stuff including TM - for a guy who was supposedly enlightened, which by his own definition meant that he had support of all the laws of nature, and every word thought and deed was in accord with cosmic law, it is mighty interesting that Marshy was always dunning the whole world for money. If M was enlightened how come the Universe just give him huge amounts for his needs just by his desiring it? -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2/6/14, salyavin808 <[email protected]> wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Transcendental Unified Field Tolstoy To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014, 4:16 PM LOL, good choice of pictures. I like the one of me particularly. But really, there's nothing here that had a designer. The nebula is beautiful but it's just a cloud of gas lit from inside by the stars within. It's actually visible to the naked eye in the constellation of Orion. Quite amazing to think of stars forming out of swirling gas and out of that gas will form planets, they are made of denser material than the hydrogen of most stars. This dense stuff came from stars exploding when they collapse at the end of their life, the pressures and heat force subatomic particles together to make everything we are made of. Very well understood. No god required. Evolution is also well understood, no need to point out the errors of the "intelligent design" crowd eh? ---In [email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote: ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: "“Help comes only from the Unified Field,” - Do you have any idea how creepy this sounds? I hope there aren't any genuine scholars reading this, they'd be edging towards the door by now... When you say unified field you mean god. Why not just admit it? The idea that there is a vast intelligence behind nature is ridiculous. It's a belief without evidence. It also seems to be completely unnecessary as there isn't anything that can't be explained without it. These aren't the hallmarks of a great theory. I really have to disagree here, take a look. This is evidence enough for me...
