--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: <snip> > > You must have forgotten my assertion that there is no such thing > > as "MMY/TMO style of enlightenment". > > This just gets stranger and stranger. Unless you are playing > sematically games, or simply don't get the concept that MMY has > defined specific attributes of what he means by enlightenemnt, UC > and BC.
I get the sense that the two of you aren't understanding the word "style" the same way. new morning, what I get from your use of the phrase "MMY style of enlightenment" is "enlightenment as MMY defines/describes it." Jim, I think, understands you to be saying that enlightenment as defined/described by MMY is not the same *state* as enlightenment as defined/described by Amma, which is not the same state as enlightenment as defined/described by SSRS, or by SBS, or whoever. Would you agree, new morning, that while different teachers define/describe that state differently, all who are enlightened may be in the same state? Is there a parallel to the metaphor "the map is not the territory," i.e., that different teachers may be using different maps for the same territory? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
