--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh > unravel once again.
And which lies would those be, Vaj? > This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron. > > Veritas liberat. > > On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Ron wrote: > > > > I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-) > > > > * I doubt it. I've come across Swami G several times in the past few > > years, and it's always been in a context of conflict. She has a very > > dualistic and fundamentalist mindset about spiritual rights and wrongs > > > > G dualistic and fundamentalist ? i preach no dogmas - nothing > > dualistic, > > maybe he doesn't like what i have to say but at least be factual > > and the > > above is about the farthest from what is here. > > > > * and how things SHOULD be. Anyone who's that fond of criticizing > > what > > is is probably not going to enjoy loving what is. > > > > G there are Many Guru's that i am quite fond of - ---- Many teachings > > and paths > > that are Fantastic. > > > > As far as loving what is - There is nothing better than being freed > > of the > > driving mind. > > Nothing better than being free of the suffering identifications. In > > any > > moment Bliss > > may be entered and enjoyed, simply from the movement of leaves on a > > tree - > > or the > > sound of a passing car which brings vibrational waves throughout > > the whole > > being. > > > > Yes this is loving what IS. Enjoying that Still point which all life > > revolves around > > is loving what IS. > > > > Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is - > > > > do you love the war ? Do you love when guru's or preachers speak > > from a > > platform > > that only continues stirring up fear or preying upon fears and > > insecurities > > ? > > There is a vast difference in Loving the person versus loving what is > > termed > > sin > > ie: that which separates and keeps one separated from that One > > Divine IS > > which > > is freedom. When things are encountered which keep separation in > > place - > > and continue keeping people bound then yes - this one will speak out. > > > > i have no anger, nothing against any individual though. i cannot > > remain in > > that > > type of mindset. i may speak against what one is doing but this has > > nothing > > to > > do with my loving them any less as having that One Divine Essence > > as Self. > > > > As far as advaitic crowd have always held that Gangaji has merit > > and gives > > a technique that is quite fine. > > > > i am simply not going to comment on a teacher and teaching that i am > > not > > familiar with ----- > > > > Neither does living within the conscious reality of Non-duality mean > > having > > a head > > in the sand when it comes to issues within the realm of duality. > > > > Unlike Balsekar i am not going to say all is perfect as it is - and if > > you are a > > murderer then that is quite fine it is perfect and just be what you > > are. > > Neither > > will i say that some of these gurus that are turning the path into a > > spiritual buisness > > are upholding the dharma and having compassion for the world state. > > > > Now if you want to call this having a dogma and being in a dualistic > > fundamentalist > > mindset then be my guest. No matter as the truth of what is said > > here will > > be born > > out eventually. > > > > May you find THAT which is the Life of ALL Life and the Death of ALL > > Death. > > maha shanti om > > 0 > > > > > > >
