I haven't yet ordered 2007 yet (waiting for the dust to settle). But I have been working with linked parts (in Sibelius) for about a year. If Finale's take on this technology is similar, the advantages are huge. Having all of the parts and score in a single file makes a much more efficient work flow than many of you yet realize. Being able to edit parts and score at the same time is also very important and helps eliminate mistakes.

The discussion about splitting a double part into individual parts is interesting . Sibelius will not do this (yet) without extracting into separate parts (files). I know everyone works differently and has different needs but, as a player, I usually prefer two parts on a page instead of one. It gives me a better idea of what's going on and helps me balance more closely with my section. The only exception is if the parts are vastly different from each other or if there are more than two parts. More than two parts per page is VERY difficult to sort out (especially at sight). The middle note is hard to see and accidentals shifting between voices get missed. Sometimes keyboardist arrangers don't get this because they read chords rather than extract a single line.

May I suggest that a better method might be simply to have the number of voices on a score stave be the same as those on a part? Sometimes the new tools make old ways less useful. I also think, in many cases, we need to re-think the use repeat patterns instead of copying repeated sections into through composed music. But that's another subject (about which I know there can be strong feelings!)

Richard Smith
www.rgsmithmusic.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Robert Patterson wrote:
it sounds like the
only advantage of linked parts is that they're all in one big file.

This is a much bigger advantage than you credit it for. Working from one file 
allows you to

a) switch instantly between part views (much faster than opening/saving/closing 
separate files).
b) work in score view to update several parts at once. For example, if you are 
changing a 'B' to a 'C', if you have several parts playing the same thing, you 
can copy/paste much more quickly because it is all within one file.
c) make global changes once. This is anything from changing the title of the 
piece to inserting or deleting measures.

You may think of it as "only" a small advantage, but I see it as a huge 
advantage over what we have now.

MM would like you to believe that you can keep you score and parts in one file, 
and they have made great strides in that direction. For many projects it 
probably is possible. All I'm saying is that even those projects for which it 
is not possible can still benefit from the linked parts features. Most of mine 
probably fall in the latter category.




_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



begin:vcard
fn:Richard Smith
n:Smith;Richard
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
url:http://www.rgsmithmusic.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to