On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Andy Ross wrote: > But do be aware that this stuff is complicated. An FSF interpretation > of their license in a FAQ is not itself a license. There are many > examples of dynamic linkage between GPL and proprietary code that are > not generally interpreted as violations (binary linux kernel drivers, > for example).
That's because Linus made the exception - not because it's allowed by the GPL - in effect he extended the rights granted by the GPL (this is allowed - it's restricting rights that's forbidden). -- Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
