Jim Wilson wrote:

> Chris Metzler said:
> >
> > 7.  Are there any guidelines for maximum complexity of 3D models
> > for scenery?  On one hand, I want to make cool things.  But OTOH,
> > I don't want to make things which are so cool that they won't get
> > used because they're too apt to drag framerates down into the
> > dirt.
> >
> I'd take a look at what is there already.  If you are adding to the
> of the generic buildings then keep the geometry super simple and textures
> under 64x64.  For more complex landmark type models like the Golden Gate
> bridge, you can get do more (maybe total of 256x256... e.g. 4  64x64
> but you will want to make sure for now that there won't be too many of
> in view at the same time.   Downtown San Francisco area is pretty well
> out now.
> Since so many folks have expressed interest in doing this kind of
> it might be nice to build alternative scenery distributions for specific
> areas similar to San Franscisco as distributed in the FlightGear base

Doing Oakland or San Jose would be a good idea to spread landmarks over the
whole base package.

Silicon Valley could also draw the interest of major computer companies
on the project. Oracle buildings are especially great and were featured
already in some movies.


Flightgear-devel mailing list

Reply via email to