On 18.05.2011 19:29, Csaba Halász wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:45 AM, ThorstenB<bre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> working/non-working OSG revision in between 11900 and 12419, you're >> welcome to let us know. Also, maybe someone has an extremely powerful >> machine and could help with testing different OSG revisions. > > My machine is not extremely powerful, but 12300 works while 12330 doesn't. Thanks Csaba, that's already close! I looked at the commit logs but didn't find any obvious culprit. A good next test would be r12312 - which is the OSG 2.9.13 dev release. Everything before 12312 was actual development (nothing obvious), everything after 12312 were code changes to fix compiler warnings and Coverity code analysis issues. This one will be fun... ;-)
> Message understood ;-) > I'll have al look during the next days. There is not much spare time to > dedicate to fg, though but I'll give it a try. Thanks Torsten, though the message wasn't specifically for you. But our FlightGear monster server could probably be helpful here indeed. cheers, Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
