2011/8/7 Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > I have now seen that this has overlapped a question from yours form yesterday > evening. I just got up today morning, took a look outside - still no summer in > mid europe - and decided to hack something. Then I just thought that this > change might be good to have... > :)
Same problem in Scotland :) > Did you really measure again how much faster this is? Just some average rule > of thumb? Running the same test as described above (Nasal geodinfo() called in 0.01 steps across a 1x1 degree area) in the same place, I got the following results from multiple runs of the code. Old scenery.cxx method: 5.78s - 6.15s Groundcache hack: 0.38 - 0.5s New scenery.cxx method: 0.1s - 0.12s The tests were run at different times, so there may be some environmental differences based on what else was running on my laptop etc. Nevertheless, that's a massive performance improvement over the old method, and a significant improvement over the groundcache hack I wrote. -Stuart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
