Thanks Alex, point taken. I would love nothing more than to help with the redesign for the challenge and experience. I think FOP is a great project that the world needs yesterday. Unfortunately my company already has too much work for me and my clone, and there's no money in the budget for a third clone at this time. I'm sure you hear this sob story all the time.
As far as paying some third-party to address performance concerns, do you think that would make sense before the redesign is completed? thx, -Matt alex wrote: > > At 03:37 25/01/02, Matt Savino wrote: > > > Arved, thanks for the status update. Looking forward to .20.3, and would > > > love to get a rough, non-binding idea when the redesign might be > > > accomplished. > > If you ask this sort of question on any Apache project where Jon S Stevens > is active you will usually get the response: "It'll be ready when its > ready." I get the impression that the redesign is at very early stages and > therefore any kind of time estimate should not be relied on. > > The other response is "Thanks for volunteering to help with the redesign" :-) > > The one he doesn't usually give is "Do you want to pay for some Java > developers to work on Fop because I'm sure we can offer a support contract" > :-) There are a few companies willing to help enhance Fop if you pay them. > > Alex > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
