Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
On Monday 13 January 2003 11:01, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
feeling inspired by your's and Oleg's suggestions and also a little
bit bored this Sunday afternoon, I thought I'll take the chance and
improve my Gimping skills. Here's the result :-)
Not bad. Something like this I meant. But (sorry for being critical,
it's art, not coding :): why it's sitting back to us.
No problem :-)
This was in no way meant to be a serious proposal for the logo.
I've also created one with a parrot sitting with it's front to us.
However, I found this one with it's impish look back over the shoulder much
nicer.
I agree. It's more interesting that way.
F and P are too simple.
Maybe. But IMHO the letters "FOP" should be easily readable and the whole
logo shouldn't be too overloaded with additional stuff.
Yes, but that still leaves quite a bit of room for font experimentation.
Peter
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
