> If it were a more invasive hack I would agree however in this case the
> hack is small and isolated and it will enable people to use 'stable'
> for FOP and Batik which is (right or wrong) important to many people.
Anyway FOP 0.90beta binaries are going to be distributed with binaries
of Batik so in this case if there will be no Batik stable release lets
distribute it with SVN version, it shouldn't be a problem ?
> I don't have really strong feelings on this but I think that adding
> the hack is the better solution.
Adam Strzelecki |: nanoant.com :|