On Tuesday 31 July 2007 20:48, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > There have been various questions on fop-user recently regarding the > RTF output of FOP. Personally I’m incapable of helping in this area, > and also most unwilling to. > > Tell me if I’m wrong, but I suspect that in the current team there is > about one person who could help / modify the code, and who wouldn’t > be very willing to either. > > More and more often people who ask questions regarding RTF are > answered that going the OpenDocument (or similar XML format) route > might be more successful. So, I’m wondering if we shouldn’t drop > support for RTF in the next release. > > Not completely, of course, but basically we wouldn’t advertise it, > and say that RTF support is provided as is, is no longer maintained, > and that users are on their own when using it. That way they would at > least be aware of the risks of going that route. > What about moving RTF to the sandbox? That should signal its incomplete / still in draft / not officially supported status.
> WDYT? > Vincent Manuel
