On 29.02.2008 11:18:57 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Looks good, Clay. Please commit it to Trunk. I'll take it from there and
> > make sure we can incorporate this in the 0.95 release. I'll also see
> > about switching to Forrest Trunk so we can use FOP 0.94/0.95 for the
> > PDFs.
> 
> Just curious: do you mean the trunk/ branch of the Forrest repo (future 
> 0.9)? Or the “trunk” version of the 0.8 branch? IIC up to now we had to 
> use the trunk version of Forrest 0.7 as auto publish wasn’t working with 
> the released version, so there seems to be trunks for every version 
> (0.7, 0.8, 0.9...).

It's confusing if you use "trunk" in the context of a branch. What you
mean is the "HEAD" revision of a branch.

I mean the HEAD revision (or at some point a fixed revision that we find
stable enough to work with) of the trunk.

> 
> > On 29.02.2008 08:34:00 The Web Maestro wrote:
> >> Howdy Folks,
> >>
> >> I've got an update to the FOP web site for the 0.95 release:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~clay/fop_refactored_0.95/
> 
> This is already looking better ;-)
> 
> 
> >> It's not too different from before, except for the 'Using FOP 0.95' &
> >> 'FOP 0.95 Features' menus in the nav for the Home tab, and I've
> 
> I’m not sure those entries should be added to the Home tab. Basically 
> they duplicate what’s in the 0.95 tab, so that will add to the confusion 
> IMO. The Home tab should remain dedicated to general informations about 
> the project. What do others think?

I'm 0 on this if it doesn't cause a maintenance problem.

> Also, have you looked at disabling the menu auto-rolling feature? If 
> not, I will ;-)
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> Thanks Clay,
> Vincent
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vincent Hennebert                            Anyware Technologies
> http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert         http://www.anyware-tech.com
> Apache FOP Committer                         FOP Development/Consulting




Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to