On 29.02.2008 11:18:57 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Looks good, Clay. Please commit it to Trunk. I'll take it from there and > > make sure we can incorporate this in the 0.95 release. I'll also see > > about switching to Forrest Trunk so we can use FOP 0.94/0.95 for the > > PDFs. > > Just curious: do you mean the trunk/ branch of the Forrest repo (future > 0.9)? Or the “trunk” version of the 0.8 branch? IIC up to now we had to > use the trunk version of Forrest 0.7 as auto publish wasn’t working with > the released version, so there seems to be trunks for every version > (0.7, 0.8, 0.9...).
It's confusing if you use "trunk" in the context of a branch. What you mean is the "HEAD" revision of a branch. I mean the HEAD revision (or at some point a fixed revision that we find stable enough to work with) of the trunk. > > > On 29.02.2008 08:34:00 The Web Maestro wrote: > >> Howdy Folks, > >> > >> I've got an update to the FOP web site for the 0.95 release: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~clay/fop_refactored_0.95/ > > This is already looking better ;-) > > > >> It's not too different from before, except for the 'Using FOP 0.95' & > >> 'FOP 0.95 Features' menus in the nav for the Home tab, and I've > > I’m not sure those entries should be added to the Home tab. Basically > they duplicate what’s in the 0.95 tab, so that will add to the confusion > IMO. The Home tab should remain dedicated to general informations about > the project. What do others think? I'm 0 on this if it doesn't cause a maintenance problem. > Also, have you looked at disabling the menu auto-rolling feature? If > not, I will ;-) > > <snip/> > > Thanks Clay, > Vincent > > > -- > Vincent Hennebert Anyware Technologies > http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert http://www.anyware-tech.com > Apache FOP Committer FOP Development/Consulting Jeremias Maerki