Non-free software can't even be "favorably mentioned"? My second suggestion was to post an official GNOME response when it is favorably mentioned. My previous suggestion was for a rule about a much narrower case.
It seems you've grafted part of one onto part of the other, and now you're criticizing a combination which nobody proposed. Wow. You and I have extremely different ideas about "freedom", Mr. Stallman. When it comes to freedom of expression, I am in favor of the freedom to advocate any views whatsoever, including favoring proprietary software. This is why I am an ACLU member. I don't know how different your ideas are, but I defend your right to state them anyway. However, the issue here is not about what people should be free to say, it is about what position GNOME should take and how to express it. People have a right to publish what they wish, but GNOME also has a right to take a stand and express that stand in its platforms. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list email@example.com http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list