Yes I would agree the sonic can be deeply intellectual but sometimes the 
intellectual (Frampton, Peter Rose’s linguistic pieces, and everyone’s text and 
voice) I don’t think of as being creatively sonic, unless one finds quotidian 
human voice to be so.


On May 16, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Francisco Torres <[email protected]> wrote:

> By excellent I mean, complex, layered, inventive, of rich and nuanced 
> timbre….excellent for it’s sonic qualities (as opposed to strictly 
> intellectual qualities).
> 
> In experimental cinema It seems impossible to separate those things.
> Just consider-
> One of the best uses of sound in cinema is Kubelka's Arnulf Rainer and yet it 
> seems the opposite of what the OP is looking for.   
> 
> 2016-05-16 15:45 GMT-04:00 <[email protected]>:
> How about a lot of the work by the folks over at the Sensory Ethnography Lab, 
> especially those involving Ernst Karel? (Leviathan, Sweetgrass….)
> 
> https://sel.fas.harvard.edu/index.html
> 
>  
> 
> Carl
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: robert harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 1:43 PM
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Exemplary Sound Design in AG Film
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for the response Fred. Somewhere in in the recesses of my mind I 
> thought of you when posting the question, a. because for decades I’ve 
> respected your insights, and b., because one of your most memorable posts 
> contained your statement (at least this is how I remember it…) that 
> Beethoven’s Grosse Fuge is a definitive avant garde work.  A smile inducing 
> and welcome statement in the context of Frameworks.
> 
>  
> 
> As to anonymity, community and the internet, I prefer my community to involve 
> warm bodies sharing tangible space. Not to say the I don’t appreciate 
> Frameworks, I do. And it’s fascinating and heartening to know that there are 
> disembodied consciousnesses out there that profess to care about something I 
> believe I care about. But this is no fun to type about abstractly. 
> 
>  
> 
> So, I’m Robert Harris. I live in greater Boston. I teach filmmaking (actual 
> 16mm bolex/arri filmmaking in addition to digital video that everyone seems 
> to think should be called film) at Fitchburg State University in central 
> Massachusetts. I used to be involved with Anthology Film Archives Video 
> Program in 70’s and 80’s.
> 
> The program for which I’m planning a sound design component is the New York 
> State Summer School of the Arts.  Its a program I’ve run for 25 years, having 
> inherited it from Gerald O’Grady.
> 
> A few lurking frame workers have taught with me and/or been visiting artists. 
> Maybe even some former students out there. Tony Conrad taught in the program 
> under O’Grady. Sharits probably had a bit to do with the program moving to my 
> care. The program is for high school students.  We teach 16mm film, digital 
> video, digital photo, computer animation, and electronic sound.  Watching 
> healthy amounts of experimental film, from 16mm prints, has always been an 
> essential part of the program.
> 
>  
> 
> So that’s that.
> 
> I appreciate the suggestions that have been offered, though I’ve not yet 
> found what I’m hoping for in the preliminary samplings I’ve been able to view 
> and hear.
> 
> So many works have music tracks, orchestral music, jazz, electronic music, 
> pop…sometimes with narration.  Sometimes the music is great, sometimes it’s 
> lacking, but my search is for sound design that reaches farther or deeper 
> than sound track music. I enjoyed re-watching The End  but it’s “just” text 
> and music.  Invocation of My Demon Brother  is “just” Mick Jagger’s 
> electronic noodlings on a MOOG.  Robert Withers just posted that Abigail 
> Child’s work is worthy, and I agree.  A title I didn’t mention earlier is 
> Robert Gardner’s Forests of Bliss.  Deborah Stratman frequently does great 
> sound work.  
> 
> I’m just hopeful that I learn that there is more really rich stuff out there. 
>  Sound is pretty wonderful.  
> 
>  
> 
> Robert Harris
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On May 15, 2016, at 9:10 PM, Fred Camper <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Why not tell us your name, location, and the name of the school?
> 
> FraneWorks doesn't feel like much of a community anymore. Or maybe I'll just 
> never get used to Internet anonymity, fine on some sex advice board but to me 
> not right for a place like this.
> 
> To be contrary, I'd suggest Christopher Maclaine's The End and The Man Who 
> Invented Gold. They are very great films, in my view but not in everyone's, 
> with great soundtracks that do not meet your criteria, but they are not 
> "strictly intellectual" either -- far from it. Made with minimal means, they 
> might seem amateurish to someone who hated them.
> 
> Then there's my favorite Bruce Baillie sound track, the one for Tung. But 
> check into what i mean before renting the film.
> 
> Fred Camper, Chicago
> 
> On 5/15/2016 2:36 PM, lagonaboba wrote:
> 
> For a class I’m preparing, I’m interested in suggestions as to Experimental 
> Films with exemplary, excellent sound design and sound editing.
> 
> By excellent I mean, complex, layered, inventive, of rich and nuanced 
> timbre….excellent for it’s sonic qualities (as opposed to strictly 
> intellectual qualities).
> 
> As I plan to rent prints, it would be helpful if the works were available 
> from FMC, Canyon, MOMA or some USA domestic distributor.
> 
> I would include:
> 
>  
> 
> Baillie’s Castro Street  & Quick Billy, 
> 
> Kubelka’s Unsere Afrikareise, 
> 
> Hindle’s Watersmith
> 
> Jack Chambers’ Hart of London
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to