* Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010419 06:20] wrote:
> 
> OOPS, I see. See updated patch.

Looks ok.

> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.248
> diff -d -u -r1.248 Makefile
> --- Makefile  2001/03/29 14:02:59     1.248
> +++ Makefile  2001/04/19 13:18:01
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
>       printcap profile protocols \
>       rc rc.atm rc.devfs rc.diskless1 rc.diskless2 rc.firewall rc.firewall6 \
>       rc.isdn rc.network rc.network6 rc.pccard rc.serial rc.shutdown \
> -     rc.syscons rc.sysctl remote rpc security services shells syslog.conf \
> -     usbd.conf \
> +     rc.syscons rc.sysctl remote rpc security services shells sysctl.conf \
> +     syslog.conf usbd.conf \
>       etc.${MACHINE_ARCH}/disktab \
>       etc.${MACHINE_ARCH}/rc.${MACHINE_ARCH} \
>       etc.${MACHINE_ARCH}/ttys \
> Index: sysctl.conf
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/sysctl.conf,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -d -u -r1.1 sysctl.conf
> --- sysctl.conf       2000/07/27 22:53:42     1.1
> +++ sysctl.conf       2001/04/19 13:18:01
> @@ -3,3 +3,10 @@
>  #  This file is read when going to multi-user and its contents piped thru
>  #  ``sysctl -w'' to adjust kernel values.  ``man 5 sysctl.conf'' for details.
>  #
> +
> +vfs.vmiodirenable=0  # Set to 1 to enable the use of the VM subsystem to
> +                     # back UFS directory memory requirements. Because of
> +                     # the amount of wasted memory this causes it's not
> +                     # advised for machines with less than 64MB of RAM, but
> +                     # on machines with more than 64MB it can provide a
> +                     # substantial benefit related to directory caching


-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to