Ach!

 

I glad we are talking about this.  It is the kind of issue that we, in 
particular, ought to think up and speak out about.  My own impulse would be to 
entertain the possibility of a LANL-SF, but negotiate some sort of arrangement, 
say, perhaps, that no classified work could be done in here.    

 

But now I have heard from several voices that I respect deeply, each speaking 
from very different kinds of experience, and all appearing to agree that even 
in the absence of War Heads, hosting a national laboratory would not benefit 
Santa Fe.  But what are the alternatives?  In other words, are the ills you 
identify inherent to all human institutions, or really only inherent to 
government ones.  Would it be better if CMU put a campus here?  I have heard 
many of you express the same doubts about universities.  Would it be better if 
Google or Amazon put a campus here?  Why?  Why are large for-profit 
institutions more to be trusted than government and academic ones?  At least 
with government institutions there is the possibility of regulating them by 
popular will.  Amazon, not so much.   Is your position that EVERY institution 
should be so small we can drown it in a bathtub?  So, set the threshold for 
anti trust action VERY low.  How bout this:  every corporation with more than a 
billion dollars in assets must place 5 percent of its annual income in a trust 
fund to encourage competing start ups.   Well, OK, split the College of Santa 
Fe campus up. Give it to ten different real estate firms with instructions that 
they must work independently.   Treat it as a hazard, rather than an 
opportunity.  

 

I heard a similar proposal for a solution to the truth problem on the internet. 
 Every retweet over ten-thousand contributes funds a conterarian tweet on the 
same stream.  In fact, how about a retweet limit on all messages.  No message 
can be retweeted more than ten-thousand times.   

 

Nick

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steven A Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 11:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: NO LANL IN SANTA FE! Wednesday, 12; 00 outside SF 
City Hall; bring friends

 

Merle, et al -

Though I reject most of the extreme arguments I hear on both sides of this 
issue, my instinct is that it would be better if Santa Fe did NOT invite 
LANL/NNSA into the development of this critical/central/prime location in the 
heart of *greater* Santa Fe.   

I've been living in a variant of this  high-dimensional, nonlinear, sometimes 
subtle and nuanced question all of my (adult) life.   I came to LANL at 24 as a 
technophilic peacenik who believed MAD made sense (1980) and was happy to 
ensure that WE had the BIG STICK.  I raised two children In Los Alamos and 
finally left in 2008 (27 years later) after Bechtel took over, remaining in the 
region and in high-tech work.   Along the way I was confronted with *many* 
changes in the international political, cultural and scientific landscape.   
The end of the Cold War and nuclear testing, a nuclear arms-race between 
India/Pakistan, two Gulf Wars, a deep and abiding awareness of the reality and 
threat of Climate Change (and other parallel Endogenous Existential Threats).

I went through a few personal transformations as well, including shepherding my 
two daughters into maturity along the way.  My opinions have become much 
stronger, broader and more nuanced over the years and I am thankful to have had 
the perspective offered through the rich gradients formed by our "tri-cultural 
heritage".   LANL is much more/less than a traditional "Anglo" company town and 
the work that goes on there is much more/less than virtually any other 
facility.  Adding Pu Pit production has expanded that yet more, while the 
unfathomably deep explorations into what may very well represent an array of  
other technological *existential threats*.  Possibly equally important 
sociopolitically, is the role of Santa Fe (and San Juan Pueblo before it) as a 
locus of European Conquest, including the Pueblo Revolt (I can see Black Mesa 
from my window as I type).  

I agree with most of Ed's assertions about the variability of quality of the 
work at LANL, and certainly question the average "value received" with such 
outrageous overheads and oft isolated efforts.  I also agree with his summary 
of the net socioeconomic impact on the region/state.   While I was (am via 
legacy savings and local available services) a beneficiary of the very large 
amount of money pumped into the region, I see the deleterious effects of it.   

With my renewed interest and awareness in the "Endogenous Existential Threats" 
of our time, I am more sensitive to the callousness of many of the people and 
programs at LANL toward the local and global environment.   The bulk of the 
memoir Frank urged me to write (to save the list from my TMI/TL;DR posts?) 
would be armatured around this braid of interesting (in every sense of the 
word) paradoxes and contradictions.   

I think New Mexico's legacy around Science and Technology is real and 
meaningful, but has also been highly distorted by the influence of government 
(and specifically Defense-related) money.

Carry On,

 - Steve

On 1/13/20 2:41 PM, Merle Lefkoff wrote:

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Leslie Lakind <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:23 PM
Subject: NO LANL IN SANTA FE! Wednesday, 12;00 outside SF City Hall; bring 
friends
To: 

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Greg Mello <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

 

Permalink <http://www.lasg.org/letters/2020/nm_12Jan2020.html>  for this 
letter. Please forward! Other Letters 
<http://www.lasg.org/letters/letters.html> 
Home page <http://lasg.org/index.htm> ; Press Releases 
<http://www.lasg.org/press/PressReleases.html> ; Bulletins 
<http://www.lasg.org/ActionAlerts/action.htm> ;
To subscribe to our Friends listserve (formerly by invitation only) send a 
blank email here. <mailto:[email protected]>  To 
unsubscribe send a blank email here.  
<mailto:[email protected]>  
To subscribe to our Main listserve (less content, less frequent) send a blank 
email here. <mailto:[email protected]>  To unsubscribe send a 
blank email here.  <mailto:[email protected]> 
Our blog (makeover coming!):  <http://lasg.org/wordpress/> Remember your 
Humanity. Twitter: @TrishABQ <https://twitter.com/#%21/TrishABQ> . 
Contribute. <http://www.lasg.org/contribute.htm>  Volunteer. Contact us (Greg 
and Trish in our main office <http://www.lasg.org/contact.htm> , Lydia Clark in 
our Santa Fe office <mailto:[email protected]> )

This letter: Press conference outside Santa Fe City Hall at noon on Wednesday 
Jan. 15 (map <https://goo.gl/maps/ycyfawsEqEYzu3wG9> ) -- please come, and 
please recruit others

Dear New Mexico friends – 

As we have explained in previous letters 
<http://www.lasg.org/letters/letters.html> , Wednesday is the day on which the 
City will announce the finalists for "Master Developer" of the former College 
of Santa Fe site (and possibly surrounding properties as well, a 64- to 
~100-acre project). The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has 
applied for this role. NNSA and/or Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are 
present in some (not all) other proposals, as tenant(s). 

The situation is opaque, fluid, and developing. So far, Mayor Webber has 
disdainfully rebuffed our requests to meet or discuss the momentous social, 
cultural, and economic development impacts of placing a nuclear weapons campus 
in Santa Fe. (Don't be deceived -- that is exactly what LANL is and what this 
would be.)

People power may be the only force stronger than LANL's money and corruption. 
We really need you to help us expand our numbers. 

If you live anywhere nearby please come to this joint press conference, and 
please ask as many friends to come as possible. Sheer attendance matters. A 
strong showing Wednesday will save countless hours of work later, and will give 
wings to efforts to push back on LANL's entirely unjustified expansion. There 
are many powerful people in Washington who know LANL specializes in taxpayer 
ripoffs. Some of them need to see some spine from us out here to take to their 
bosses. 

New Mexico is being selected to be a nuclear weapons support and sacrifice 
area. That now includes the Santa Fe metro area. 

We may not know know the outcome of this first Midtown Campus decision by noon 
Wednesday but regardless of that we must seize the day. 

While it seems absurd that NNSA could be a possible "master developer," we 
can't be sure that Mayor Webber and the people around him wouldn't want that -- 
or want, say, a training facility for plutonium workers. We just don't know. 

This event will also give us a chance for us to network with each other and 
with representatives of any other groups present, as well as speak to any City 
officials willing to do so. 

Getting people to come on Wednesday is the sole action item we are recommending 
right now. It is very, very important!  

Thank you!

Greg, Trish, Lydia, Ernie, Michelle, and the rest of the Study Group

-- 

Greg Mello
Los Alamos Study Group <http://www.lasg.org/> 
2901 Summit Place NE
Albuquerque, NM 87106
505-265-1200 office
505-577-8563 cell

To subscribe to our Friends listserve send a blank email here. 
<mailto:[email protected]>  To unsubscribe send a blank 
email here.  <mailto:[email protected]> 

To subscribe to our Main listserve (less frequent) send a blank email here. 
<mailto:[email protected]>  To unsubscribe send a blank email 
here.  <mailto:[email protected]> 

Our blog:  <http://lasg.org/wordpress/> Remember your Humanity. Twitter: 
@TrishABQ <https://twitter.com/#%21/TrishABQ> . We have shut down our Facebook 
page.

---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>




 

-- 

America is waking up, as Germany once did, to the awareness that 

1/3 of your people would kill another 1/3, while 1/3 watches. 

Werner Herzog

 








 

-- 

Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org <http://emergentdiplomacy.org> 

Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2

twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff





============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to