Lawry,

 

You are a fool.  Worse,  you are an ingratiating fool.  

 

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of de Bivort Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 12:11 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The 'New Normal' of Unemployment

 

Hi, Ed,

 

I am only now getting caught up on postings here -- and there are a lot of them 
-- and have not seen those threads that I imagine you are referring to, Ed. No 
one, including, Arthur, wants, deserves, or needs potshots to be taken at them, 
and my message to Arthur is not meant to refer to or parallel any other 
discussions here.  My message refers solely to the one post he made that is 
copied. If my message to Arthur came at a time when he is being attacked in any 
of the threads here, I certainly do not mean to 'pile on.'

 

Cheers,

Lawry

 

 

On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Ed Weick wrote:





>From what I've seen on the list lately, I think the pot shot are being aimed 
>at Arthur.

 

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 

From: de Bivort Lawrence <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION 
<mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:17 AM

Subject: Re: [Futurework] The 'New Normal' of Unemployment

 

Poor Arthur! 

 

You just can't control your desire to take potshots at Islam, can you?

 

Is this revenge for anti-Semitism? If it is, you should know that anti-Semitism 
does not come from the Islam, but from Europeans and, increasingly, Americans.

 

Some day, Arthur, you may actually set out to learn something about Islam.  It 
will open your eyes. So much of what you could learn would surprise and delight 
you.

 

But somehow you have become invested in bashing Islam, in the same way that 
anti-Semites bash Jews.  

 

As for the 30s and the 60s, I know of many intellectuals in the 30s and know 
many in the 60s who were not "taken" with Russia, nor Mao. What silly 
generalizations you allow yourself!

 

Why be part of the world of hate and ignorance? Why do you let such nonsense 
detract from your ability to think?

 

Lawry

 

 

 

On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Arthur Cordell wrote:





Be careful of what you embrace, it might turn around and bite you later on.

Intellectuals in the 30’s were equally taken with Russia, intellectuals in the 
60’s were equally taken with Mao.  Some intellectuals are taken with Islam 
today.

Intellectuals seeking total solutions sometimes grab on to total ideologies not 
realizing that change comes bit by bit.  Small bites are more easily 
digestible.  

A revolution is not a tea party.  Be careful of what you ask for.  Do you have 
smooth hands and wear glasses?  The Khmer Rouge would have you killed for this 
“crime” since it is clear that you are not a worker.

As Clinton would say, “I feel your pain” but there is little I can offer to 
ease that pain.  

arthur

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 10:48 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The 'New Normal' of Unemployment

In human systems, what is it that resists a descent into apathetic  randomness?

   

You may be right about our inability to communicate but I’ve made my way out of 
more than one cave-in when I’ve tried cross cultural communication.     It 
seems to me that there are certain tools necessary in the designing of a 
society.   It also seems to me that the knowledge of the past and the knowledge 
of historical systems is also necessary.    It also seems to me that most of 
that knowledge is stored in cultural artifacts and to a large degree in works 
for the stage, film, concert hall, opera house etc.     

You can learn very little about the context for the U.S. Constitution if you 
never been to New England or walked the hills of Tennessee and Georgia.   The 
extant architecture, the literature, the culture contained within the schools 
and the churches and the expressions themselves all provide an insight into 
what made this world come into being.    You have to look through the American 
problem of “face” and the tendency to make history “nice” for the legacy.    As 
Obama said in Tucson, we need to be civil but we need to speak the truth as 
well.    

We need to study  the two industrial revolutions, the break-up of the old 
families in the remaking of the schools, the assumption of complex culture by 
the wealthy beginning with Higginson at Harvard and Boston, the revamping of 
the educational structure at the turn of the century into the current 
professional forms and specialties, the entrance of the German and Viennese 
intellectuals escaping from Hitler into the University of Chicago which has fed 
the current revolution down to the current President.     It seems that it is 
hard to know how things came to be unless you are serious about cause and 
effect.   

And finally there is the rise of the “core value” of society as monetary which 
is a new bird.     As recent as the 1960s Paul Tillich and Reinhold Niebuhr 
said that the definition of faith in your God was what you held to be your core 
value.    Today’s core values are monetary which according to the two 
theologians [and I believe Martin Buber would have agreed] that money has 
become the God of the current world.    So whatever money does is OK. 

Is that a world that you would build if you were doing as the Chinese 
economists, artists and engineers and designing a society and a future culture? 
   I spoke with one of my Elders today whose son is an urban planner.    He’s 
spending his time learning Mandarin.    The exciting part of the world for 
today’s architects is China and for others it’s the Islamic world.      Both 
have the power to design a society.    One from an aristocracy and the other 
from an authoritarian, evidently [hopefully]  benevolent cultural world view.   
  Why no entropy there?     Why no trains across America?   Why claptrap old 
cars and airports closed killing the business of the American small towns?    
Entropy?  or excuse?     I’m not sure how to talk to you?     Like the man 
skiing down Everest, “nothing works.”     I like you and admire your list and 
your work here but it feels like there’s no answer.

REH


- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur>  <javascript:void(0)> 
<image001.png>


Droit de seigneur or lord's right, often used synonymously with jus primae 
noctis or simply primae noctis and its translation right of the first night, ...

History <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur#History>  - 
Similarities to other traditions 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur#Similarities_to_other_traditions>
  - Literary and other references 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur#Literary_and_other_references>  
- References <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur#References> 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur - Cached 
<http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:SqawlLVdMrgJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur+Droigt+de+Seigneur&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
  - Similar 
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=related:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur+Droit+de+Seigneur&tbo=1&sa=X&ei=RwY1TcfYLsOC8gaypeT_CA&ved=0CBwQHzAA>
 

►

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:41 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The 'New Normal' of Unemployment

You mean do societies wind down or become more chaotic over time?

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 7:08 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The 'New Normal' of Unemployment

Arthur,  what do you think about entropy as applied to societies?

REH

Snip, snip, snip…………..

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

 

  _____  

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to