It' not fair to compare a camera whose negative is 4x5 with digital cameras. Compare them to a 35mm for fairness.
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Glenn Schunemann wrote:
> > damn good, I thought. 4 MP is pretty close to "true" photo quality.
>
> I'll argue this statement until the day you pry my 4x5 view camera from my
> cold, dead hands. :)
And my 5x7 view camera.... Hopefully someday my 8x10, and only Kodak will be
able to take my Kodachrome away.... :-)
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
