J Sand wrote: > It' not fair to compare a camera whose negative is 4x5 with digital cameras. > Compare them to a 35mm for fairness. > > > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Glenn Schunemann wrote: > > > > damn good, I thought. 4 MP is pretty close to "true" photo quality.
That all depends on your definition of photo quality..... I happen to use Kodachrome 64 for my underwater work and can make prints to 16x20 and you still can't see grain. I'm about to venture to 20x24.... Then again some people's auctions on eBay claim to have photos..... fortunately you still need to have some ability to make 'quality' photos :-) -- Alan Miller Underwater Photographer http://home.earthlink.net/~uwphoto/ 9600/233 w/ G3/470 XLR8 ZIF, 1.5 G RAM, OS 9.1 eBay ID uwphotoer Live each day like it is your last because someday you'll be right. -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
