You made me chuckle.

2009/1/2 Wallace Adrian D'Alessio <[email protected]>:
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Dan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> At 12:43 PM -0500 1/2/2009, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote:
>>>  > At 11:40 AM -0500 1/2/2009, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote:
>>>>>Apple Mac hardware utilizing Intel chips is optimized for Mac OS X.
>>>>
>>>>  The hardware is NOT optimized for Mac OS X.  The SOFTWARE is
>>>>  optimized for the hardware, sortof.  Most of the Operating System,
>>>>  drivers, etc, are written in a generic HOL (higher order language).
>>>>  98% of the optimizations come from the HOL compiler (be it C, C++,
>>>>  Objective C, Java, etc).  *Maybe* 2% are from developer choices, to
>>>>  take advantage of a specific feature of the hardware.  That's why
>>>>  it's so easy to port OS X to different platforms... PowerPC, Intel
>>>>  Core, ARM,...
>>>>
>>>>>OS X was originally authored on Intel developer machines long before an
>>>>>Intel mac was first sold to an end user.
>>>>
>>>  > OS X was *ported* to Intel, not "authored".
>>>
>>>So, just that I may understand this assertion in light of the opinion
>>>held here by many that Apple computer hardware is the cream of the
>>>computer crop comparable to Mercedes Benz automobiles in quality
>>
>> There's not much in a x86 Mac that's "special".  Most of it is
>> off-the-shelf parts.  The desktops are high-quality (lowest repair
>> rate in the industry).  The laptops are ... sigh (highest repair rate
>> in the industry).
>>
>>>you are saying Apple did NOT design the motherboard architecture to
>>>run OS X as well or better than any other hardware? Say it ain't so
>>>Dan!
>>
>> What could they do to "fit" the system to the OS?  Intel controls
>> most of it now - they provide most of the chips and specify how
>> everything interconnects etc.  This isn't the old days, when Apple
>> put a bunch of custom chips on the board.  Think about it -- when you
>> slap WIndoze on an x86 Mac, what doesn't work?  Now look at the
>> hackintosh projects, running OS X on generic PC hardware FASTER than
>> on x86 Macs...
>>
>
>
> Oh , please , please Dan, Don't burst our Mac as Mercedes premium
> grade hardware bubble.
> {gasp!} that would mean the only thing keeping it from being a  (
> horrors!) PC is the badge and the OS!  Thank god you won't tell me
> that a low down PC hardware company like ( aauugghh!) ASUS makes the
> motherboards. That would be just TOO much to bear!
>
> >
>



-- 
-hackmiester

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to