Hi Dark,

Dark wrote:

Take a look at this table. it lists the number of screen or rooms in
each level for snes prince of persia, and the number of enemies found
on those levels.

My reply:

Yeah, i just did. That's exactly what I'm talking about. The
mainstream games I've played like Prince of Persia is way more complex
than MOTA. There are several more rooms, enemies, and the traps in
Prince of Persia are totally awesome. The metal jaw trap is one of the
cooler ones that come to mind.

That's why when I held my Logitech game pad in my hands playing
through MOTA the thought occured to me that I'm totally dissatisfied
with the game. It was in a word "lame." I played better games than
this. I played games for the Atari, NES, and SNES, that I couldn't put
down. the replay value in some of the mainstream games was fantastic,
and I started to think about what gave those games replay value.

Complex Traps --- All of the games I like from Prince of Persia to
Tomb Raider make extensive use of difficult traps like vanishing
platforms, spinning gears, rolling bolders, you name it. You usually
can't just press jump and avoid that trap. You have to try a number of
times to actually get past it.

Puzzle Elements ---- This can be anything from a certain key or lever
that unlocks door x to something more safisticated. I'll have to take
a bit of look at some common puzzles to come up with a cool list of
these to employ here.

Level Design ---  Nobody expects a walk along beat-m-up like Batman or
Double Dragon to employ mazes. However, games in the Prince of Persia,
Montezuma's Revenge, Tomb Raider genre often use some bit of a maze
type level to get around. It is a widely excepted part of that style
of game genre.

Dark wrote:

As for map design, I'd personallly say write all new ones, -----
afterall, montizumas revenge is a completely separate game afterall.

My reply:

Good point. I was just asking since a lot of people preordered
expecting Montezuma's Revenge and thought I'd throw that idea out
there for those maybe looking for something a bit similar.

Dark wrote:

Rather than just dumping the work you've got thus far though, how
about keeping the original first level, sinse it provides a very good
and easy intro
to the game, but then afterwards getting creative with the mazes etc.

My reply:

Well, there are both practical and technical reasons I don't want to
do this. On the technical side of things I setup and initialize the
size of my array etc to make every level a fixed size I.E. same width
and height. I can't go from a 300 by 20 level to a 100 by 100 level in
the same game. Therefore what Ineed to do is set a standard format for
the levels and draw the maps according to that format. On the
practical side I just plane don't like the first two levels of MOTA.
Oh, they are okay, but I know they could be better. Make sense?

Besides creating new levels is the easy and fun part. What took me so
darned long before was all the low-level stuff that goes into an
engine like base classes, input support, a window manager, audio
support, and so on. Getting that stuff out of the way is a huge load
off my shoulders, and now I can actually work on the game for real


Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.

Reply via email to