On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:46:56PM -0800, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > 2011/11/9 7:13 -0800, m...@klomp.org: > > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:10 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >> While looking at the trademark license I was surprised to find version > >> 1.1 at http://openjdk.java.net/legal/openjdk-trademark-notice.html and > >> in the actual code repositories. A long time ago there was a proposal > >> for a version 1.2 of the trademark license ... > > > > Sorry for digging up this old topic. But it would be nice to get this > > cleaned up. Especially since the 1.1 version seems to only mention jdk6 > > and people are shipping jdk7 variants now. > > I'll find someone to take care of this.
Did you find someone? I am preparing my Fosdem "Can I legally do that?" talk, and the answer for what can be named how kind of depends on whether the upgraded trademark license will be made official or not. Is there a reason for the delay or is it just that still nobody got to it? Thanks, Mark
