> Feel free to propose some more verbose names, but the whole idea is to remove > the verbosity. Almost everything but [CC] and [SW] else gets executed once > per build. If there is an error it's going to be pretty obvious where it came > from, especially with GN where it's just a simple replacement of Generating: > with [GN]. Honestly, how many people do you think will be messing with the > parser? It's less than 5. We've run out of ISAs at this point. The only ISAs > that come to mind at the moment are PARISC and IA64. One is dead and the > other might as well be.
A few things come to mind. 1) I think slightly more verbose names are OK and probably good. We've cut down significantly on the verbosity already, so we can add some back. 2) One thing that needs to be thought about is SOURCE vs TARGET. It seems that we should always use one or the other, no? My guess is that we should always use $TARGET. (Should we use both?) 3) If we choose $SOURCE, should it be from the actual source directory (i.e. not the BUILDDIR copy), or not? 4) I think we should strip BUILDDIR from the output (which for many people is just build/, but for me is much longer). Stripping build/ adds room for #2. I sent Ali code for this. (And I just realized that there is better code so talk to me) Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
