On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote:
> This sounds like a vote to support the status quo, which isn't > something we normally do. The original proposal was limited to VOTEs on personnel issues (misspelled as "personal"). Has that changed? I hope not. One of the downsides of resolving this issue through lazy consensus is that no codified proposal with clear language has emerged, setting the stage for later disputes about just what we agreed to. I anticipate that except in the rarest of circumstances, there will be no confusion about what constitutes the status quo for personnel issues. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
