Would anyone be willing to write up the text that we would post on the web site someplace to document a procedure for voting upon IPMC membership that reflects this discussion? Perhaps we could then lazily converge upon that?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > This sounds like a vote to support the status quo, which isn't > > something we normally do. > > The original proposal was limited to VOTEs on personnel issues (misspelled > as > "personal"). Has that changed? I hope not. > > One of the downsides of resolving this issue through lazy consensus is > that no > codified proposal with clear language has emerged, setting the stage for > later > disputes about just what we agreed to. > > I anticipate that except in the rarest of circumstances, there will be no > confusion about what constitutes the status quo for personnel issues. > > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
