Peter Donald wrote: > > I am not familiar enough with it but I was under the impression that it is > just the language and an absolute minimum of the runtime that is > standardized. It would be the equivelent of stripping 95% out of java class > libraries and standardizing that. The rest is still kept closed I thought. s/still kept closed/not yet standardized/ True, what is currently being standardized so far is a bit closer in size to JDK 1.1 or JDK 1.2 than JDK 1.4, nor does it attempt to compete on equal terms with J2EE. - Sam Ruby http://www.ecma.ch/ecma1/MEMENTO/TC39-G3.HTM --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Berin Loritsch
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Sam Ruby
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Berin Loritsch
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Peter Donald
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Sam Ruby
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Sam Ruby
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Ted Husted
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Berin Loritsch
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Jon Stevens
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Ceki G�lc�
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Peter Donald
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Alex Fern�ndez
- Re: [OT] $un, M$ and Java Berin Loritsch
