Hello Henri, > I bet a lot of Jakarta does not conform - it's only when a release > happens that we think about bringing it up to date. This is not a > problem of the POI community but a problem of the Jakarta community > structure and for the PMC. It's the PMC's responsibility to make sure > these releases are right and not the POI community.
OK. > A plus point of POI as a TLP is that then it becomes the POI > community's responsibility far more (as I imagine there would be far > more of 1:1 ratio of committers to PMC there). You see a chance to move POI to TLP in the current situation? I've always see "going TLP" as a way to gain visibility, and would have expected the board to make sure that projects doing that step are working well. You've definitely more insight here. > Let's not go over the top here - the release itself isn't that bad and > it's got the important things right (license, notice). Having gone and > looked at them, I'm not overly worried about the two particular > releases themselves, just that it's clear that information is not > getting out to POI and that it urgently needs to somehow. OK again. Thanks for putting that into perspective. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
